Commit b5480cb
Aditya Singh
fix(usage): copy RequestUsage entries instead of mutating other in place
The elif branch in Usage.add() was mutating agent_name/model_name directly
on the RequestUsage objects inside other.request_usage_entries, bypassing
the non-overwrite guard and causing silent mis-attribution when the same
Usage instance was added to multiple aggregators.
Fix: create a new RequestUsage copy for each entry with the annotation
applied, leaving the originals unchanged.
Adds a regression test that verifies the original entries are not mutated.1 parent 9d73f17 commit b5480cb
2 files changed
+54
-6
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
238 | 238 | | |
239 | 239 | | |
240 | 240 | | |
241 | | - | |
| 241 | + | |
| 242 | + | |
| 243 | + | |
242 | 244 | | |
243 | | - | |
244 | | - | |
245 | | - | |
246 | | - | |
247 | | - | |
| 245 | + | |
| 246 | + | |
| 247 | + | |
| 248 | + | |
| 249 | + | |
| 250 | + | |
| 251 | + | |
| 252 | + | |
| 253 | + | |
| 254 | + | |
248 | 255 | | |
249 | 256 | | |
250 | 257 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
610 | 610 | | |
611 | 611 | | |
612 | 612 | | |
| 613 | + | |
| 614 | + | |
| 615 | + | |
| 616 | + | |
| 617 | + | |
| 618 | + | |
| 619 | + | |
| 620 | + | |
| 621 | + | |
| 622 | + | |
| 623 | + | |
| 624 | + | |
| 625 | + | |
| 626 | + | |
| 627 | + | |
| 628 | + | |
| 629 | + | |
| 630 | + | |
| 631 | + | |
| 632 | + | |
| 633 | + | |
| 634 | + | |
| 635 | + | |
| 636 | + | |
| 637 | + | |
| 638 | + | |
| 639 | + | |
| 640 | + | |
| 641 | + | |
| 642 | + | |
| 643 | + | |
| 644 | + | |
| 645 | + | |
| 646 | + | |
| 647 | + | |
| 648 | + | |
| 649 | + | |
| 650 | + | |
| 651 | + | |
| 652 | + | |
| 653 | + | |
0 commit comments