I am annotating a large codebase with heavy use of mixin patterns, where classes sharing similar attributes inherit the mixin for additional functionality.
One pattern in particular is failing on mypy (but passes on pyright and ty): where slots are involved in the concrete class. Let's look at this MRO, where HasTimestampMixin offers another way of setting the timestamp attribute.
from datetime import datetime
class HasTimestampMixin:
__slots__ = []
# Attribute contract: concrete subclasses provide this slot.
timestamp: str | None
@property
def timestamp_dt(self) -> datetime | None:
if self.timestamp is None:
return None
return datetime.fromisoformat(self.timestamp)
@timestamp_dt.setter
def timestamp_dt(self, dt: datetime | None) -> None:
# this line fails with
# Trying to assign name "timestamp" that is not in "__slots__" of type "repro.HasTimestampMixin" [misc]
self.timestamp = None if dt is None else dt.isoformat()
class ConcreteMessage(HasTimestampMixin):
__slots__ = ["timestamp"]
timestamp: str | None
def __init__(self) -> None:
self.timestamp = None
message = ConcreteMessage()
message.timestamp_dt = datetime(2026, 7, 30)
print(message.timestamp) # Output: 2026-07-30T00:00:00
Removing the __slots__ in the mixin class fixes the typing issue but breaks the runtime by no longer having slots in the concrete class.
I am annotating a large codebase with heavy use of mixin patterns, where classes sharing similar attributes inherit the mixin for additional functionality.
One pattern in particular is failing on mypy (but passes on pyright and ty): where slots are involved in the concrete class. Let's look at this MRO, where
HasTimestampMixinoffers another way of setting thetimestampattribute.Removing the
__slots__in the mixin class fixes the typing issue but breaks the runtime by no longer having slots in the concrete class.