Skip to content

Reviewer 2 - Conclusions - comment 2 #186

Closed
#208
Closed
Reviewer 2 - Conclusions - comment 2#186
#208
Assignees
CaptainSifff
Labels
ConclusionsAnything related to the Conclusions section in the paperreview commentComment by a reviewerreviewer 2Comments by the second reviewer

Description

@Chilipp
Chilipp
opened on Jun 17, 2026

Reviewer comments:

You do not discuss risks or failure modes. For example, what happens if a central RSE unit cannot get enough project funding? What if it competes with existing IT or RDM units? Add a short paragraph on risks.

Activity

  1. Chilipp
    added
    review commentComment by a reviewer
    reviewer 2Comments by the second reviewer
    ConclusionsAnything related to the Conclusions section in the paper
    on Jun 17, 2026
  2. CaptainSifff
    self-assigned this
    on Jun 26, 2026
  3. CaptainSifff
    linked a pull request that will close this issueAdd a risk section #208on Jun 26, 2026

  4. dokempf commented on Jun 26, 2026

    @dokempf
    dokempf
    on Jun 26, 2026
    Collaborator

    Meeting outcome: Make "Risk Assessment" a subsubsection 5.2.5 @CaptainSifff macht das

  5. CaptainSifff commented on Jul 2, 2026

    @CaptainSifff
    CaptainSifff
    on Jul 2, 2026
    Collaborator

    The text now is in a separate subsubsec and has a sentence for each weakness mentioned by reviewers in various issues. Feel free to recheck!

  6. dokempf
    closed this as completedin #208on Jul 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

ConclusionsAnything related to the Conclusions section in the paperreview commentComment by a reviewerreviewer 2Comments by the second reviewer

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions