Skip to content

Decide storage semantics for trusted client IP shared secret #1145

Description

@aram356

Source finding from PR #1049 documentation refresh: trusted_client_ip.shared_secret is redacted in diagnostics but remains inline in the configuration blob and is not returned by secret_fields.

Acceptance: document a security decision. Either confirm and test inline storage as intentional, or migrate the value to a secret-store reference with compatibility and validation coverage.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

questionFurther information is requestedrustPull requests that update rust code

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions