[question] function signature changed, revise here or upto downstream? #152

With the v3.6.0 update in
#117

one function add_active_gotos! has changed the number of arguments it accepts - with the result that downstream that uses LoweredCodeUtils now may break: a common setup is to have both Revise.jl and JET.jl, both of them uses LoweredCodeUtils but with default/no [compat] section, it would update LoweredCodeUtils to 3.6.0, and break JET.jl
aviatesk/JET.jl#823

Is it better/more up to downstream to pin a version/change code, or is it better to add a default argument so the old 4-arg call without specifying controller still works?

add_active_gotos!(isrequired, src::CodeInfo, cfg::CFG, postdomtree, controller::SelectiveEvalController=SelectiveEvalController())