Refine Developer Program setup guidance - #279
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 6a28c64: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Changes recommended
The updated billing prerequisites introduce an “MCA” acronym reference without defining it on first mention, which reduces clarity in a key setup requirement section.
Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.
Pull request overview
This PR refines Microsoft 365 Developer Program setup guidance by updating eligibility/renewal references and improving billing prerequisite links to authoritative Microsoft Learn documentation.
Changes:
- Removes the Microsoft employee eligibility note from the Visual Studio subscriber onboarding article.
- Links “qualified development activities” renewal criteria directly to the FAQ definition.
- Adds Microsoft Learn deep links for MCA, Azure plan, billing profile/invoice section, and spending-limit requirements in billing prerequisites.
File summaries
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/microsoft-365-developer-program-get-started.md | Adds Microsoft Learn links for billing prerequisites in the sandbox setup guidance. |
| docs/join-with-visual-studio.md | Removes the employee-eligibility callout and links renewal criteria to the FAQ definition. |
Review details
- Files reviewed: 2/3 changed files
- Comments generated: 1
- Review effort level: Lite
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
PoliCheck Scan ReportThe following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans. ✅ No issues foundMore information about PoliCheckInformation: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term |
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 996a372: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
Changes are limited to documentation refinements with consistent internal linking patterns and no detected correctness issues in the updated content.
Review details
- Files reviewed: 2/3 changed files
- Comments generated: 0 new
- Review effort level: Lite
Summary
Validation
git diff --check