Skip to content

docs(linux): Update linuxptp clone URL and branch for HSR/PRP PTP#735

Open
danish-ti wants to merge 1 commit into
TexasInstruments:masterfrom
danish-ti:prp-ptp
Open

docs(linux): Update linuxptp clone URL and branch for HSR/PRP PTP#735
danish-ti wants to merge 1 commit into
TexasInstruments:masterfrom
danish-ti:prp-ptp

Conversation

@danish-ti

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Update the linuxptp repository URL from the bigeasy fork to the mda fork, and update the branch from hsr_prp_v2_plus to hsr_prp_ptp. Also remove the now-unnecessary config file patching steps.

Update the linuxptp repository URL from the bigeasy fork to the mda fork,
and update the branch from hsr_prp_v2_plus to hsr_prp_ptp. Also remove
the now-unnecessary config file patching steps.

Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>
key (destination MAC for P2P delay-request messages) into the ``[global]``
section just after the ``delay_mechanism`` key. The second command replaces the
``[eth1]`` and ``[eth2]`` section headers with the actual interface names:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why remove all of these details . is it no longer relevant ? is there a different interface names/configs that is changed to ?

Keep the depth of documentation consistent ( only change the url part)


The `linuxptp-hsr <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bigeasy/linuxptp-hsr.git>`_
implementation on the ``hsr_prp_v2_plus`` branch supports PTP (Precision Time Protocol)
The `linuxptp <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mda/linuxptp.git>`_

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@danish-ti, the commit message mentions:

Update the linuxptp repository URL from the bigeasy fork to the mda fork, and update the branch from hsr_prp_v2_plus to hsr_prp_ptp. Also remove the now-unnecessary config file patching steps.

What is the reason for switching from bigeasy fork to mda fork? Is it because the config file patching can be avoided? If yes, why not contribute to bigeasy fork directly? If that's not the case, what is the reason?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@danish-ti, additionally, linuxptp is a well known repository at:
https://github.com/richardcochran/linuxptp
which 'DOES NOT' support HSR.

So naming the mda fork as linuxptp instead of naming it linuxptp-hsr as the bigeasy fork has done may cause confusion. I believe the bigeasy fork had a valid reason for naming the repository as linuxptp-hsr instead of linuxptp (which is to distinguish it from the main repository - https://github.com/richardcochran/linuxptp and avoid confusion to users).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants