[SPARK-57271][PYTHON] Propagate traceback locals to Python planner runner#57509
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR propagates
SPARK_TRACEBACK_WITH_LOCALSfromPythonPlannerRunnerwhenspark.sql.execution.pyspark.udf.tracebackWithLocals.enabledis enabled.It also adds a UDTF
analyzeregression test that raises from the planner-side Python worker and verifies the surfaced traceback includes the local variable.Why are the changes needed?
PythonPlannerRunneralready readsspark.sql.execution.pyspark.udf.tracebackWithLocals.enabled, but it did not addSPARK_TRACEBACK_WITH_LOCALSto the Python worker environment. As a result, planner-driven Python paths such as UDTFanalyzedid not honor the traceback-locals config, unlike regular Python UDF execution.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. When
spark.sql.execution.pyspark.udf.tracebackWithLocals.enabledis enabled, Python exceptions raised through planner-driven Python paths can now include local variables in their tracebacks.How was this patch tested?
Passed:
Attempted but not run locally because the Spark assembly could not be built in this environment:
The SBT launcher fetch failed, and Maven dependency resolution failed because Maven Central hostnames did not resolve from this local environment. The PySpark test runner then failed at startup with
Cannot find assembly build directory, please build Spark first.Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
Generated-by: OpenAI Codex (GPT-5)