Upgrade Rubocop 1.88.2

[DMarinhoCodacy]

No description provided.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request primarily updates numerous Ruby gem dependencies in Gemfile.lock, including a major upgrade to Rails 8.1.3 and RuboCop 1.88.2, along with many RuboCop extensions. Concurrently, it introduces documentation for several new RuboCop cops and updates existing cop descriptions across various docs/description/*.md files, including grammatical corrections, improved explanations, and updated examples. The docs/description/description.json and docs/patterns.json files have also been updated to reflect these changes. The review comments highlight several issues with the generated documentation, such as incorrect parsing of RuboCop directives, incorrect source URLs for extension cops, and formatting errors like missing newlines in code examples.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

Although the PR successfully updates RuboCop metadata to version 1.88.2 and satisfies Codacy standards, the generated documentation is currently not in a mergeable state. A systemic tool failure has caused labels (like '# bad') to be concatenated directly onto code lines across dozens of files, making them unreadable and invalid for copy-pasting. Furthermore, several files contain logical contradictions—marking identical code blocks as both 'good' and 'bad'—and one documentation file (I18n_GetText_DecorateFunctionMessage.md) is corrupted. A specific logic error in the Style/ArrayIntersect documentation must also be corrected, as the suggested refactor would invert program logic.

About this PR

• The PR description is missing, which is problematic for a change touching over 100 files. Furthermore, a widespread formatting failure exists where documentation markers are merged with code; this should be addressed at the source of the generation script rather than through manual file-by-file fixes.

Test suggestions

• Verify that all new patternIds in description.json have a matching .md file in docs/description/
• Validate the syntax and structure of docs/patterns.json and docs/description/description.json against their expected schemas

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify that all new patternIds in description.json have a matching .md file in docs/description/
2. Validate the syntax and structure of docs/patterns.json and docs/description/description.json against their expected schemas

_{TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}