Skip to content

Add @ps-codeql to CODEOWNERS for experimental cryptography#19201

Merged
nicolaswill merged 1 commit intogithub:mainfrom
nicolaswill:patch-1
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

Add @ps-codeql to CODEOWNERS for experimental cryptography#19201
nicolaswill merged 1 commit intogithub:mainfrom
nicolaswill:patch-1

Conversation

@nicolaswill
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request adds @github/ps-codeql as a code owner of **/experimental/quantum/ to support the development of post-quantum cryptography-related libraries and queries.

We’ll be committing stable but experimental work to these directories as it becomes ready for public use, with a near-term goal of moving it out of experimental.

To get started, we’d also need write access to github/codeql.

cc @adityasharad @lcartey

This pull request adds @github/ps-codeql as a code owner of `**/experimental/quantum/` to support the development of post-quantum cryptography-related libraries and queries.

We’ll be committing stable but experimental work to these directories as it becomes ready for public use, with a near-term goal of moving it out of experimental.

To get started, we’d also need write access to `github/codeql`.

cc @adityasharad @lcartey
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 2, 2025 12:20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

Files not reviewed (1)
  • CODEOWNERS: Language not supported

Tip: Copilot code review supports C#, Go, Java, JavaScript, Markdown, Python, Ruby and TypeScript, with more languages coming soon. Learn more

@nicolaswill nicolaswill merged commit 62fa136 into github:main Apr 2, 2025
6 checks passed
@nicolaswill nicolaswill deleted the patch-1 branch April 3, 2025 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants