-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
Rust: Add model for str.trim #19310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Rust: Add model for str.trim #19310
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bfe9cdf
Rust: Add model for str.trim and as_bytes.
geoffw0 c06f340
Rust: Make str / String models consistent.
geoffw0 40a5db6
Rust: Other tests affected.
geoffw0 fea82d4
Merge branch 'main' into trim
geoffw0 39a875e
Rust: Make some summaries value type.
geoffw0 432d4b0
Merge branch 'main' into trim
geoffw0 77d3c95
Merge branch 'main' into trim
geoffw0 9da6d94
Rust: More tests affected.
geoffw0 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The function
<str>::as_stris value preserving, it just returnsself. I thinkas_bytesshould be consideredvaluepreserving as well. It is defined as and doesn't change the value, only its type.I'm a little in doubt of whether to consider
str::to_stringto be value preserving as well. I'm not sure whether we consider copies to be taint or value preserving in other cases.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea. Done.
I would say no, because in general
to_stringis not value preserving.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True, it's only value "preserving" for
Stringandstr.