Skip to content

chore(release): bump VERSION to 0.6.0#1022

Closed
ashleyshaw wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
release/v0.6.0
Closed

chore(release): bump VERSION to 0.6.0#1022
ashleyshaw wants to merge 2 commits into
developfrom
release/v0.6.0

Conversation

@ashleyshaw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Part of release/v0.6.0 preparation.
Closes #968


file_type: "documentation"
description: "PR template router"
name: "Which PR template should I use?"
about: "Branch-to-template routing for consistent PR governance"
title: "PR: {short summary}"
labels: ["status:needs-review"]

Which PR template should I use?

Use this file as a router. Copy the matching template from the GitHub
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/ folder based on your branch prefix, then
replace this body with that template.

Quick selector

Branch prefix Template
feat/ pr_feature.md
fix/ pr_bug.md
hotfix/ pr_hotfix.md
refactor/ pr_refactor.md
chore/ pr_chore.md
docs/ pr_docs.md
test/ pr_chore.md
perf/ pr_feature.md
ci/ pr_ci.md
build/ pr_ci.md
deps/ pr_dep_update.md
security/ pr_bug.md
design/ pr_feature.md
a11y/ pr_feature.md
ux/ pr_feature.md
release/ pr_release.md
research/ pr_feature.md
revert/ pr_chore.md
i18n/ pr_feature.md
ops/ pr_chore.md
proto/ pr_feature.md
ds/ pr_feature.md
api/ pr_feature.md
schema/ pr_feature.md
telemetry/ pr_feature.md
content/ pr_docs.md
seo/ pr_docs.md
config/ pr_chore.md
migrate/ pr_chore.md
qa/ pr_chore.md
uat/ pr_chore.md

Template links

Why this matters

Correct template selection improves label automation, changelog quality, and
review consistency. The routing rules are defined in
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/config.yml.

Linked issues

Closes #

Changelog

Added

Changed

Fixed

Removed


Risk Assessment

Risk Level:

Potential Impact:

Mitigation Steps:


How to Test

Prerequisites

Test Steps

  1. Step 1:
  2. Step 2:
  3. Step 3:

Expected Results

Edge Cases to Verify


Checklist (Global DoD / PR)

  • All AC met and demonstrated
  • Tests added/updated (unit/E2E as appropriate)
  • Docs/readme/changelog updated (if user-facing)
  • Risk assessment completed above
  • Testing instructions provided above

References


Part of release/v0.6.0 preparation.
Closes #968
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚫 This PR description is missing required template content.

Missing required section(s): Linked issues & merged PRs, Changelog, Global DoD checklist

Please update the PR body using one of the repository PR templates:

Empty placeholders, unchecked checklist boxes, and stub issue references do not count.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@ashleyshaw, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 58 minutes and 14 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3ffd52d3-c278-4a9b-9c46-7286c0513287

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29fd7ac and 5780544.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The VERSION file is updated from 0.5.0 to 0.6.0, reflecting the minor release version bump associated with the v0.6.0 release cycle.

Changes

Version Bump

Layer / File(s) Summary
VERSION file updated to 0.6.0
VERSION
Single-line change replacing 0.5.0 with 0.6.0.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is incomplete. It mentions the release context but fails to use the required pr_release.md template with essential sections like Risk Assessment, How to Test, and completion of the Changelog section. Replace the generic template router with the pr_release.md template. Complete all required sections including Risk Level, Changelog entries, testing instructions, and the DoD checklist.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the primary change: bumping VERSION to 0.6.0 as part of release preparation.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The VERSION bump to 0.6.0 directly fulfils issue #968's requirement for the release agent to bump VERSION and is properly linked via 'Closes #968'.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed The change is narrowly scoped to the VERSION file increment, which is explicitly required by issue #968 as part of the automated release process.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release/v0.6.0

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the project version from 0.5.0 to 0.6.0 in the VERSION file. I have no feedback to provide.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Bumps version from 0.5.0 to 0.6.0 (minor release).
Closes #968
@mergify mergify Bot mentioned this pull request Jun 19, 2026
7 tasks
@ashleyshaw ashleyshaw closed this Jun 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Release v0.6.0 — Community Health, Governance Docs, and Meta Agent Foundations

1 participant