Fix stale RFC cross-references in RFC-0008 - #43
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
HumairAK
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2026
mprahl
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
RFC-0008 refers four times to "RFC-0009: Extended Skill Bundles." Since it merged, that follow-up was renumbered to RFC-0010 and retitled Extended Agent Plugins (PR #27), and the RFC-0009 slot now holds Skill Tracing (PR #37). Developers reading RFC-0008 while implementing it would be pointed at the wrong number and name.
This PR is editorial only; no design content changes:
Posted by Bill Murdock with assistance from Claude Code.