Closed
Conversation
- Create new `async_visualization.py` agent extension because it needs to be async to init the mcp servers Signed-off-by: Aidan Jensen <aidan@artificial.com>
Contributor
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 10 days with no activity. |
Contributor
|
This PR was closed because it has been inactive for 7 days since being marked as stale. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think it makes more sense for this to be a breaking change in the existing visualizations extension, but wanted to run it by in a PR before considering this.
It also may make sense to make this an optional generation step. Would be open to input on that as well
async_visualization.pyagent extension because it needs to be async to init the mcp servers