Repository navigation
SocketModeClient.connect() retries forever against a permanently closed aiohttp ClientSession #1922
Description
Title
SocketModeClient.connect() retries forever against a permanently closed aiohttp ClientSession
Environment
slack_sdk3.43.0- File:
slack_sdk/socket_mode/aiohttp/__init__.py - Relevant locations: session creation ~L130,
is_connected()~L321-334,connect()~L347-409,close()~L446-457
Description
SocketModeClient (aiohttp implementation) keeps a single aiohttp.ClientSession for the client's entire lifetime — a reasonable design, per the comment at its creation: "it is suggested you use a single session for the lifetime of your application, to benefit from connection pooling." The bug isn't that design choice; it's that the unbounded retry loop doesn't handle that session ever entering a closed state.
connect() wraps reconnection attempts in while True: (~L352). On exception it logs "Failed to connect (error: {e}); Retrying..." (~L408) and loops again, reusing self.aiohttp_client_session. If that session itself has been closed (not just the individual WebSocket tracked as self.current_session), every subsequent retry fails identically forever with RuntimeError: Session is closed — nothing inside this loop ever recreates the session; that only happens when a new SocketModeClient instance is constructed from scratch.
Separately, is_connected() checks self.current_session/ping-pong state but does not check self.aiohttp_client_session.closed, so downstream consumers building their own health checks or watchdogs on top of this client have no way to detect this specific failure mode without reaching into a private-ish attribute themselves.
Impact observed
In production, a consumer application's own reconnect watchdog (checking is_connected()) never detected this state, because the WebSocket layer could still look "connected enough" (some event types were still being delivered) while the HTTP session underneath was permanently dead. The client was stuck retrying every ~10 seconds for over 24 hours with no self-healing, until the whole process was restarted externally.
Likely forced repro (not yet reduced to a minimal script)
- Construct a
SocketModeClientwith a valid app token;await client.connect(). await client.aiohttp_client_session.close()(or otherwise force it closed) while the connection is established.- Trigger a reconnect attempt (e.g. disconnect the network, or otherwise cause
connect()'s loop to retry). - Observe it fails forever:
Failed to connect (error: Session is closed); Retrying... - Observe
is_connected()may not reflect the problem ifself.current_session(the WebSocket) hasn't itself been marked closed/None.
Suggested fixes (ranked)
- Preferred: in
connect()'s retry loop, checkself.aiohttp_client_session.closedat the top of each iteration; if closed, recreate it (e.g. re-instantiateaiohttp.ClientSession) before retryingws_connect. - Minimum: if recreating isn't desired,
raiseorbreakout of the loop when the session is closed, so the caller can rebuild the whole client instead of retrying forever against a dead one. - Consumer-facing improvement: reflect
aiohttp_client_session.closedinis_connected()(or an equivalent health-check property), so consumers can detect this without reaching into a non-public attribute.
Notes
We don't have a minimal standalone repro yet — this was diagnosed from production logs plus reading this source after a ~39 hour incident where a single client instance got stuck in this state. Happy to help characterize a repro further if useful. We've worked around this downstream by having our own consumer explicitly check aiohttp_client_session.closed before deciding whether to rebuild — happy to link that once it's merged, in case the pattern is useful context here too.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Aug 24, 2026
👋 It looks like this issue has been open for 30 days with no activity. We'll mark this as stale for now, and wait 10 days for an update or for further comment before closing this issue out. If you think this issue needs to be prioritized, please comment to get the thread going again! Maintainers also review issues marked as stale on a regular basis and comment or adjust status if the issue needs to be reprioritized.
WilliamBergamin commentedon Sep 3, 2026
Hello @shivasymbl thanks for writing in 🙏 I was able to reproduce this locally we will plan to address this in a patch soon