Skip to content

docs: fix broken star history charts - #1077

Open
OctoBored wants to merge 1 commit into
sonofmagic:mainfrom
OctoBored:fix/star-history-chart
Open

docs: fix broken star history charts#1077
OctoBored wants to merge 1 commit into
sonofmagic:mainfrom
OctoBored:fix/star-history-chart

Conversation

@OctoBored

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The current star history charts are broken because the underlying GitHub stargazer API is unreliable. This change points the charts to a working alternative so visitors can again see the project's star history.

The star history chart generated by GitHub's stargazer API has been broken, so the chart dependency is switched to an alternative source that requires no API token. Update the chart domain in both README.md and README_en.md.
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 91f77e7

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@sonofmagic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks for the PR. This account appears to be opening many near-identical fix/star-history-chart PRs at an automated cadence. Could you clarify whether this PR/account is operated by a bot or another automated agent, and whether you are affiliated with star-history.dera.page or its maintainer? This will help us evaluate the provenance of the new external dependency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants