fix(capability-matrix): correct coverage scope metric description#64
Open
grdsdev wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix(capability-matrix): correct coverage scope metric description#64grdsdev wants to merge 1 commit into
grdsdev wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The "Coverage scope" card said features "marked implemented/partial" but the underlying computeParity() logic only counts strictly `implemented` status, per the strict cross-SDK parity change in #63. Reword the text to match the actual logic instead of the logic. Also fix missing leading "%" to match the other metric card's style.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
computeParity()inreport.tsonly counts strictlyimplementedstatus (per the deliberate strictness introduced in feat(capability-matrix): strict cross-SDK parity score + coverage scope #63) — reworded the description to match the actual logic.Test plan
npm run typecheckpasses