Issues

• should options be inputs ?

  xproc/notes#20 · Filter by author xquery opened on Feb 12, 2016
  4

• xproc api

  xproc/notes#19 · Filter by author xquery opened on Feb 12, 2016
  2

• Annotations

  xproc/notes#18 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 11, 2016
  6

• We need comments

  xproc/notes#17 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 11, 2016
  2

• "Replacement" assumes XPath

  xproc/notes#16 · Filter by author nic-gibson opened on Feb 11, 2016

• How do the semantics of ! work?

  xproc/notes#15 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• How is order specified?

  xproc/notes#14 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• default context

  xproc/notes#13 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• What about constructors for atomic types?

  xproc/notes#12 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• What about AVTs in data constructors?

  xproc/notes#11 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• Semantics of >> "literal.xml"

  xproc/notes#10 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• Data flow semantics

  xproc/notes#9 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• Port bindings vs. step invocation

  xproc/notes#8 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• making conversion dead simple in xproc ...

  xproc/notes#7 · Filter by author ndw opened on Feb 10, 2016

• Can you write a function that returns a step?

  xproc/notes#6 · Filter by author xproc opened on Feb 10, 2016

• The spec description of 'output binding' is misleading

  xproc/notes#5 · Filter by author xproc opened on Feb 10, 2016

• Reconsider the binding syntax

  xproc/notes#4 · Filter by author xproc opened on Feb 10, 2016

• rationalise definition of 'step chain'

  xproc/notes#3 · Filter by author xquery opened on Feb 10, 2016