OCPBUGS-96892: Revert "OCPBUGS-87829: Scope minted AWS IAM policies to cluster-owned resources"#1057
Conversation
…o cluster-owned resources" This reverts commit 383d3a2 (PR openshift#1043).
|
@redhat-chai-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-96892, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 23 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-5.0-e2e-aws-csi If this passes I will merge the revert today. |
|
@dgoodwin: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/468eaa30-76e1-11f1-9fce-07bb33211d05-0 |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1057 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 47.28% 47.03% -0.25%
==========================================
Files 97 97
Lines 12631 12583 -48
==========================================
- Hits 5973 5919 -54
- Misses 6001 6008 +7
+ Partials 657 656 -1
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/override ci/prow/security |
|
/lgtm |
|
@dlom: Overrode contexts on behalf of dlom: ci/prow/security DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/verified by everyone |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dlom, redhat-chai-bot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@dlom: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@dlom: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-96892, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@dlom any update on this? I would be fine with closing them, if this one gets merged, if the later reintroduction/fix of it includes the logic addressed in #1053 |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@neisw: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-96892, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/okd-scos-images |
|
@neisw: Overrode contexts on behalf of neisw: ci/prow/okd-scos-images DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@redhat-chai-bot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@redhat-chai-bot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-96892: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull request, linked via external tracker, has not merged: All associated pull requests must be merged or unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-96892 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. This PR is marked as verified. If the remaining PRs listed above are marked as verified before merging, the issue will automatically be moved to VERIFIED after all of the changes from the PRs are available in an accepted nightly payload. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.22 release-4.21 release-4.20 |
|
@nrb: #1057 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.22": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Revert PRs for the remaining release branches where #1043 cherry-picks had already merged: release-4.21: #1060 (reverts #1046) Cherry-pick PRs for release-4.19, 4.18, and 4.17 were still open and have been closed without merging. These reverts need /lgtm and CI overrides (/override ci/prow/security) to merge. cc @dlom |
Summary
This reverts commit 383d3a2 (PR #1043), which introduced scoped IAM policies for cluster-owned resources.
Why
PR #1043 caused multiple regressions in the
e2e-aws-csijob — all snapshot-related tests have been permafailing since Jun 29. This has blocked PRs from merging in any repository that usesaws-csias a required presubmit, includingopenshift/origin.Merge conflict resolution
PR #1053 (OCPBUGS-95187: Reclassify
ec2:ModifyNetworkInterfaceAttributeas unscoped) modified the scoped/unscoped action maps introduced by #1043. Since this revert removes those maps entirely, #1053's changes are also effectively reverted and will need to be re-applied when the scoping feature is re-landed.Unreverting
To unrevert, please land a corrected version of this feature that fixes the snapshot test failures and verify with:
A fix is being investigated in PR #1054.