Skip to content

i18n(ja): unify the Japanese term for Request Capacity Unit (RCU) - #23430

Merged
qiancai merged 2 commits into
pingcap:i18n-ja-release-8.5from
yahonda:i18n-ja-rcu-term
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

i18n(ja): unify the Japanese term for Request Capacity Unit (RCU)#23430
qiancai merged 2 commits into
pingcap:i18n-ja-release-8.5from
yahonda:i18n-ja-rcu-term

Conversation

@yahonda

@yahonda yahonda commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

The RCU term ("Request Capacity Unit") was rendered several ways in the Japanese docs — リクエスト容量ユニット, リクエスト容量単位, and 要求容量ユニット — alongside the intended fixed katakana compound リクエストキャパシティユニット.

This PR unifies the 13 容量-family occurrences → リクエストキャパシティユニット across 10 files, matching the established compound (per the house rule: capacity is normally 容量, but the RCU proper term is the fixed katakana リクエストキャパシティユニット).

Left unchanged (verified):

  • The bare acronym RCU and the (RCU) glosses.
  • Generic 容量 (disk/memory capacity): count went 573 → 560, i.e. exactly the 13 RCU conversions and nothing else.

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
  • v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
  • v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
  • v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

N/A

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

The RCU term (Request Capacity Unit) was rendered inconsistently: リクエスト容量ユニット,
リクエスト容量単位, and 要求容量ユニット, alongside the intended リクエストキャパシティユニット
(a fixed katakana compound). Unify the 13 容量-family occurrences to リクエストキャパシティユニット
across 10 files. The bare RCU acronym and generic 容量 (disk/memory capacity) are left unchanged
(verified: generic 容量 count 573→560, exactly the 13 RCU conversions, nothing else touched).
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign tangenta for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 34192e0c-4dc7-4a0a-a958-60a1431835c5

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 4, 2026
@qiancai qiancai added translation/no-need No need to translate this PR. and removed missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. labels Aug 5, 2026
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Aug 5, 2026
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2026-08-05 12:24:38.197856649 +0000 UTC m=+2617264.233951705: ☑️ agreed by qiancai.

@qiancai
qiancai merged commit 02ba16b into pingcap:i18n-ja-release-8.5 Aug 5, 2026
1 of 6 checks passed
@yahonda
yahonda deleted the i18n-ja-rcu-term branch August 6, 2026 00:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. translation/no-need No need to translate this PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants